3rd TCom Meeting: 3rd October 2012 Discussions and Notes

From IMarine Wiki

Revision as of 08:43, 3 October 2012 by Fabrice.brito (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Meeting Agenda

Meeting Participants

Web conference system

Geospatial Cluster

Presenter: F. Brito (Terradue)

Slides: .pptx file

Presenter: G. Coro (CNR)

Slides: .pptx file

Participants: A. Antoniadis (NKUA), W. Appeltans (UNESCO), N. Bailly (FIN), C. Baldassarre (FAO), J. Barde (IRD), C. Bekiari (FORTH), E. Blondel (FAO), F. Brito (Terradue), L. Candela (CNR), V. Canhos (CRIA), H. Caumont (Terradue), P. Cauquil (IRD), G. Coro (CNR), A. Ellenbroek (FAO), P. Fabriani (E-IIS), N. Holdsworth (ICES), G. Kakaletris (NKUA), A. Manzi (CERN), Y. Marketakis (FORTH), P. Pagano (CNR), M. Taconet (FAO), E. Travaglino (E-IIS);

A concrete list of data sources that the community is willing to have available in the infrastructure should be defined.

  • (F. Brito) an alternative approach might be to focus on the variables (e.g. SST, Salinity) to be made available, then to prioritize variables and finally to identify the potential providers/data sources;
    • Identify variables (SST, PAR, Ice concentration) => prioritisation
    • Identify datasources (repositories) => prioritisation
    • Identify tools (including data policies) => prioritisation
      • (N. Holdsworth) Issue on global variables or local variables? Variable prioritisation is driven by data coverage (temporal and spatial) and quality.
  • (J. Barde) yet another approach should be to build to build a catalogue of products and services by relying on OGC standards, e.g. register a CSW URI; E.g. SeaDataNet is a catalogue of CSW services;
    • (P. Pagano) this might have limitations on effective data exploitation that is limited to the protocols supported;
    • catalogue is effective for resources discovery;
  • (M Taconet) The Board should start identifying the needed resources and define the scope;
  • (J. Barde) Data providers are requested to describe their data and products by ISO19115 and ISO19119 metadata formats (this is part of INSPIRE);
    • (J. Barde) they are working with a company developing code to transform NetCDF files to ISO standards;
    • it is expected that the infrastructure links data sources compliant with such formats;
    • clients are willing to use / are expecting to use these approaches;
  • (V. Canhos) the sustainability of the infrastructure depends from the sustainability of the resources providers;

The GeoSpatial cluster goals/objectives are

1. Data discovery - main repositories of environmental, fisheries and biodiversity geospatial sources netCDF-CF repositories: My Ocean, Seadatanet, IRD World Ocean Database, Ocean data portal Other iMarine partners geospatial sources (defined by OBIS, IRD, FAO, ICES)

2. Data access - main taxonomic and biodiversity repositories Increased granularity in data access with OPeNDAP, WCS, WFS (including GML2-3) Defining geospatial needs (including product subscription approach) and their availability

3. Data processing; R geospatial, WPS/HADOOP, IE potential in enrichment, geospatial analyses and modelling Define enrichment needs of bio-ecological or activity occurrences with environmental data: OBIS Ocean Physics, VTI, VME Designing and planning implementation for enrichment capacity Advanced geospatial analytical and modelling features - e.g. R geospatial, reallocation, aggregation Defining advanced geospatial processes required in reallocation, aggregation, interpolation Designing and planning implementation for geospatial processes capacity

4. Data visualization - Interactive map viewer enabling visualization of geospatial biodiversity and fisheries data Defining Visualization functionalities - SPREAD, OBIS, VME-DB, VTI Designing and planning implementation for visualization

Closing remarks

i-Marine would become a catalogue of geospatial sources? i-Marine is planning to offer processing capacities for environmental enrichment and a subscription. i-Marine is identifying business cases derived from the points above.

IE provides the services and data to allow the reallocation of catch statistics within i-Marine

IRD the long term vision is to deal with OGC standards to allow third party providers and users to enjoy data and services within i-Marine.

HC: we address the same challenges as other infrastructure in Europe. The key is how the infrastructure address downstream services. Then how the I/F addresses scientists. For that, scientists need to see what data is available (e.g. environmental data, time-series) in terms of quality, time/spatial coverage, etc. i-marine could provide a dashboard to show that.

Sustainability is a key point, seen by some as a constraint. CRIA shows that the sustainability depends on the sustainability of the federated sources and providers.

Semantic Cluster

Presenter: J. Barde (IRD)

Slides: .pdf file

Presenter: C. Baldassarre (FAO)

Slides: [xxx]

Participants: A. Antoniadis (NKUA), W. Appeltans (UNESCO), N. Bailly (FIN), C. Baldassarre (FAO), J. Barde (IRD), C. Bekiari (FORTH), E. Blondel (FAO), F. Brito (Terradue), L. Candela (CNR), V. Canhos (CRIA), H. Caumont (Terradue), P. Cauquil (IRD), G. Coro (CNR), A. Ellenbroek (FAO), P. Fabriani (E-IIS), N. Holdsworth (ICES), J. Keizer (FAO), G. Kakaletris (NKUA), A. Manzi (CERN), Y. Marketakis (FORTH), P. Pagano (CNR), M. Taconet (FAO), E. Travaglino (E-IIS);

Personal tools