2012.11 WP3: Governance and Policy Development Monthly Activity By Task and Beneficiary
From IMarine Wiki
(→FAO Activities) |
(→Terradue Activities) |
||
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
=== Terradue Activities === | === Terradue Activities === | ||
- | + | ||
+ | Terradue reviewed the Visualization document provided by FAO (E. Blondel). Along side with the comments we suggested the inclusion of R as an approach to visualize raw and aggregated data from time-series. The approach has been prototyped with the R code sent by IRD. | ||
+ | Terradue initiated an open discussion on the support of legacy applications on the WPS-hadoop framework. Several legacy applications very useful for the environmental contextualization are written in IDL (e.g. IRD legacy applications). | ||
+ | Effort should be invested on the how iMarine deals with legacy applications. | ||
<xh4> Deviations and Corrective Actions </xh4> | <xh4> Deviations and Corrective Actions </xh4> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | None. | ||
<xh4> Achievements </xh4> | <xh4> Achievements </xh4> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | Comments to visualization approach and techniques. | ||
=== UNESCO Activities === | === UNESCO Activities === |
Revision as of 21:31, 9 December 2012
|
This WP3 Activity Report described the activities performed in November 2012 by Beneficiary and Task.
It is part of Monthly Activity Report.
T3.1 User Community Mediation
FAO Activities
FAO participated to the iMarine review in Brussels.
In the mediation task, FAO continued to engage with the EA-CoP. examples are
- The FishFinder group that is interested in receiving a VRE for Species Fact Sheets.
- The Cotrix collaboration shaping with the VocBench group in FAO
- FLOD dissemination activity
None to report in this Month.
D3.4 on validation was produced.
ERCIM Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
CNR Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
Terradue Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
FIN Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
UNESCO Activities
Preparation (rehearsal) and attending the iMarine review meeting
Promoting the VREs (ecological niche modeling) through twitter and linkedin
IRD Activities
New page on the wiki to describe the semantic cluster activities [1].
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
T3.2 Governance Mechanisms, Policies and Guidelines Development
FAO Activities
The Feed-back period for the iMarine Board Meeting 2 closed, and in this reporting period the reporting was performed.
The report of the iMB2 is delayed.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
ERCIM Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
CNR Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
FIN Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
UNESCO Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
CRIA Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
IRD Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
T3.3 Harmonisation of Metadata, Semantics and Technologies
FAO Activities
Activities continued on:
- FLOD; mainly defining the TLO and preparing data.
- SPREAD; discussion the implementation of the re-allocation algorithm and the data discovery across infrastructures.
- Cotrix; discussions with the VocBench team to align activities in a work-plan. Prepare contract for developer.
Requirements collection and validation of outputs involved staff from FAO, FIN, CRIA, IOC/Unesco
D3.4 was delayed a few days due to late interventions that required clarifications.
D3.4 was produced.
CNR Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
NKUA Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
FORTH Activities
The TLO-Development activity has recently been planned to follow the six sub-activities (or tasks) described here http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/Top_Level_Ontology. As the process of developing the TLO ontology is based on an Iterative and Incremental development approach (we will have more than one iteration for each involved task), we have focused on an ontological analysis of FLOD and ECOSCOPE and reporting what has been observed and investigated.
none
none
Terradue Activities
Terradue reviewed the Visualization document provided by FAO (E. Blondel). Along side with the comments we suggested the inclusion of R as an approach to visualize raw and aggregated data from time-series. The approach has been prototyped with the R code sent by IRD. Terradue initiated an open discussion on the support of legacy applications on the WPS-hadoop framework. Several legacy applications very useful for the environmental contextualization are written in IDL (e.g. IRD legacy applications). Effort should be invested on the how iMarine deals with legacy applications.
None.
Comments to visualization approach and techniques.
UNESCO Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
CRIA Activities
The beneficiary should report here a summary of the activities performed in the reporting period
The beneficiary should report here major issues faced in the reporting period and the identified corrective actions, if any.
The beneficiary should report here a bullet list highlighting the main achievements of the reporting period
IRD Activities
Work on metadata standards for geospatial cluster: 19115 and 19119 (19139) as a way describe data sources and related services. CSW as a way to enable iMarine infrastructure to harvest IRD data. Technology watch on WPS for R and IDL processings. Technology watch on quadstore mechanisms in Jena (in progress)
Update of previous metadata to share a common approach with FAO.
A first WPS (R code) has been shared and validated with Terradue. This will be used for other R codes.